CVE Tools

CVE-2026-56914

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 0th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether any Android devices you manage are potentially exposed to untrusted physical/local access (e.g., shared company phones, devices kept in public-facing areas, field staff devices without tight physical controls).
  2. Identify the exact Android version and security patch level on each affected device.
  3. If a device is out of date, upgrade it to the latest Android security update available for that device/model line; if no fixed version is provided for CVE-2026-56914, plan to upgrade to the newest available security patch as an interim containment measure.
  4. Restrict local access: require device passcodes, enable full-disk encryption, and prevent unattended device access to reduce the chance an attacker can get local access.
  5. If you can’t confirm whether you’re fixed yet, isolate the device from sensitive access (VPN/internal apps, admin portals) until it’s upgraded and verified.

What it is

From the CVE record

In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-56914 is an Android weakness where a local attacker can exploit a memory locking bug to raise privileges without needing any clicks or logins—if you have a hostile user on a device, you should treat it as urgent, but if no one else can access the device, risk may be lower.

CVE-2026-56914 is a local use-after-free caused by improper locking in Android, enabling privilege escalation without authentication or user interaction once an attacker has local access.

If you're affected

  • Device takeover by a local attacker
  • Access to private business data
  • Disruption through system compromise
  • Potential malware persistence

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS0th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

<0.1% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 0th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

8 events over 6 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Record updated
  3. Record updated
  4. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.4 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Android, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store