Red Hat Jboss A-mq
21 CVEs tracked. 1 of them are in CISA KEV.
This hub aggregates every CVE we track for Red Hat Jboss A-mq, a product in the operating systems space. Use it to gauge the current risk picture and drill into individual advisories.
Red Hat Jboss A-mq CVEs per month
| Month | CVEs |
|---|---|
| 2024-10 | 0 |
| 2024-11 | 0 |
| 2024-12 | 0 |
| 2025-01 | 0 |
| 2025-02 | 0 |
| 2025-03 | 0 |
| 2025-04 | 0 |
| 2025-05 | 0 |
| 2025-06 | 0 |
| 2025-07 | 0 |
| 2025-08 | 0 |
| 2025-09 | 0 |
| 2025-10 | 0 |
| 2025-11 | 0 |
| 2025-12 | 0 |
| 2026-01 | 0 |
| 2026-02 | 0 |
| 2026-03 | 0 |
| 2026-04 | 0 |
| 2026-05 | 0 |
| 2026-06 | 0 |
| 2026-07 | 0 |
| 2026-08 | 0 |
| 2026-09 | 0 |
Severity
How the 21 CVEs score on CVSS. Severity is not exploitation: KEV is counted above.
- Critical1
- High2
- Medium18
Latest CVEs
The 15 most recently published vulnerabilities affecting Red Hat Jboss A-mq.
- CVE-2022-4245Codehaus-plexus: xml external entity (xxe) injection4.3
- CVE-2023-34462netty-handler SniHandler 16MB allocation6.5
- CVE-2023-35116jackson-databind through 2.15.2 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or other unspecified impact via a crafted object that uses cyclic dependencies. NOTE: the vendor's perspective is that ...4.7
- CVE-2023-1664A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak....6.5
- CVE-2023-20861In Spring Framework versions 6.0.0 - 6.0.6, 5.3.0 - 5.3.25, 5.2.0.RELEASE - 5.2.22.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL expression ...6.5
- CVE-2022-24823Local Information Disclosure Vulnerability in io.netty:netty-codec-http5.5
- CVE-2022-25647Deserialization of Untrusted Data7.7
- CVE-2020-36518jackson-databind before 2.13.0 allows a Java StackOverflow exception and denial of service via a large depth of nested objects.7.5
- CVE-2021-43797HTTP fails to validate against control chars in header names which may lead to HTTP request smuggling6.5
- CVE-2021-21348XStream is vulnerable to an attack using Regular Expression for a Denial of Service (ReDos)5.3
- CVE-2021-21349A Server-Side Forgery Request can be activated unmarshalling with XStream to access data streams from an arbitrary URL referencing a resource in an intranet or the local host6.1
- CVE-2021-21350XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack5.3
- CVE-2021-21351XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack5.4
- CVE-2021-21342A Server-Side Forgery Request can be activated unmarshalling with XStream to access data streams from an arbitrary URL referencing a resource in an intranet or the local host5.3
- CVE-2021-21344XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary Code Execution attack5.3
Product grouping is registry-driven, with AI assist and human review. How it works