CVE Tools

Surgemail

18 CVEs tracked. None of them is in CISA KEV.

This hub aggregates every CVE we track for Surgemail, a product in the communications space. Use it to gauge the current risk picture and drill into individual advisories.

Surgemail CVEs per month

Oct 2024 to Sep 2026. Point at a month, or focus the strip and use the arrow keys.
Surgemail CVEs per month
MonthCVEs
2024-100
2024-111
2024-120
2025-010
2025-020
2025-030
2025-040
2025-050
2025-060
2025-070
2025-080
2025-090
2025-100
2025-110
2025-120
2026-010
2026-020
2026-030
2026-040
2026-050
2026-060
2026-070
2026-080
2026-090

Severity

How the 18 CVEs score on CVSS. Severity is not exploitation: KEV is counted above.

  • Critical422%
  • High211%
  • Medium1161%
  • Low16%

Latest CVEs

The 15 most recently published vulnerabilities affecting Surgemail.

  1. CVE-2024-11990Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) en SurgeMail de NetWin4.6
  2. CVE-2012-2575Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in NetWin SurgeMail 6.0a4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the SRC attribute of an IFRAME element in the body of an HTML e...4.3
  3. CVE-2010-3201Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in NetWin Surgemail before 4.3g allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the username_ex parameter to the surgeweb program.4.3
  4. CVE-2008-7182Buffer overflow in the IMAP service in NetWin Surgemail 3.9e, and possibly other versions before 3.9g2, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute a...4.0
  5. CVE-2008-2859Unspecified vulnerability in the IMAP service in NetWin SurgeMail before 3.9g2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via unknown vectors related to an "imap command."5.0
  6. CVE-2008-1498Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP service in NetWin Surgemail 3.8k4-4 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long first argument to the LIST command.9.0
  7. CVE-2008-1497Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP service in NetWin SurgeMail 38k4-4 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via long arguments to the LSUB command.9.0
  8. CVE-2008-1055Format string vulnerability in webmail.exe in NetWin SurgeMail 38k4 and earlier and beta 39a, and WebMail 3.1s and earlier, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) and p...7.5
  9. CVE-2008-1054Stack-based buffer overflow in the _lib_spawn_user_getpid function in (1) swatch.exe and (2) surgemail.exe in NetWin SurgeMail 38k4 and earlier, and beta 39a, allows remote attackers to cause a den...6.4
  10. CVE-2007-6457Stack-based buffer overflow in the webmail feature in SurgeMail 38k4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long Host header.5.0
  11. CVE-2007-4372Unspecified vulnerability in NetWin SurgeMail 38k on Windows Server 2003 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors. NOTE: this information is based upon a vague advisory by a vulnerability info...10.0
  12. CVE-2007-4377Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP service in SurgeMail 38k allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the SEARCH command. NOTE: this might overlap CVE...6.0
  13. CVE-2007-2655Unspecified vulnerability in NetWin Webmail 3.1s-1 in SurgeMail before 3.8i2 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, possibly a format string vulnerability that allows remote code execution.7.5
  14. CVE-2004-2547NetWin (1) SurgeMail before 2.0c and (2) WebMail allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via HTTP requests that (a) specify the / URI, (b) specify the /scripts/ URI, or (c) specify a...2.6
  15. CVE-2004-2548Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in NetWin (1) SurgeMail before 2.0c and (2) WebMail allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (a) a URI containing the sc...4.3

Product grouping is registry-driven, with AI assist and human review. How it works

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store