CVE Tools

Imail

38 CVEs tracked. None of them is in CISA KEV.

This hub aggregates every CVE we track for Imail, a product in the communications space. Use it to gauge the current risk picture and drill into individual advisories.

Imail CVEs per month

Oct 2024 to Sep 2026. Point at a month, or focus the strip and use the arrow keys.
Imail CVEs per month
MonthCVEs
2024-100
2024-110
2024-120
2025-010
2025-020
2025-030
2025-040
2025-050
2025-060
2025-070
2025-080
2025-090
2025-100
2025-110
2025-120
2026-010
2026-020
2026-030
2026-040
2026-050
2026-060
2026-070
2026-080
2026-090

Severity

How the 38 CVEs score on CVSS. Severity is not exploitation: KEV is counted above.

  • Critical718%
  • High1026%
  • Medium2053%
  • Low13%

Latest CVEs

The 15 most recently published vulnerabilities affecting Imail.

  1. CVE-2011-1430The STARTTLS implementation in the server in Ipswitch IMail 11.03 and earlier does not properly restrict I/O buffering, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert commands into encrypted SM...6.8
  2. CVE-2007-2795Multiple buffer overflows in Ipswitch IMail before 2006.21 allow remote attackers or authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via (1) the authentication feature in IMailsec.dll, which triggers...9.0
  3. CVE-2007-5094Heap-based buffer overflow in iaspam.dll in the SMTP Server in Ipswitch IMail Server 8.01 through 8.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a set of four different e-mail messages ...7.5
  4. CVE-2007-1637Multiple buffer overflows in the IMAILAPILib ActiveX control (IMailAPI.dll) in Ipswitch IMail Server before 2006.2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the (1) WebConnect and (2) Co...9.3
  5. CVE-2004-2422Multiple features in Ipswitch IMail Server before 8.13 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via (1) a long sender field to the Queue Manager or (2) a long To field to the Web...5.0
  6. CVE-2004-2423Unknown vulnerability in the Web calendaring component of Ipswitch IMail Server before 8.13 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via "specific content."5.0
  7. CVE-2005-2160IMail stores usernames and passwords in cleartext in a cookie, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information.7.5
  8. CVE-2005-1252Directory traversal vulnerability in the Web Calendaring server in Ipswitch Imail 8.13, and other versions before IMail Server 8.2 Hotfix 2, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via "..\...5.0
  9. CVE-2005-1255Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the IMAP server in IMail 8.12 and 8.13 in Ipswitch Collaboration Suite (ICS), and other versions before IMail Server 8.2 Hotfix 2, allow remote attackers to...10.0
  10. CVE-2005-1254Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP server for Ipswitch IMail 8.12 and 8.13, and other versions before IMail Server 8.2 Hotfix 2, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service ...5.0
  11. CVE-2005-1256Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP daemon (IMAPD32.EXE) in IMail 8.13 in Ipswitch Collaboration Suite (ICS), and other versions before IMail Server 8.2 Hotfix 2, allows remote authenticated us...10.0
  12. CVE-2004-1520Stack-based buffer overflow in IPSwitch IMail 8.13 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long IMAP DELETE command.4.6
  13. CVE-2004-0297Buffer overflow in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) daemon (iLDAP.exe 3.9.15.10) in Ipswitch IMail Server 8.03 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and execu...10.0
  14. CVE-2002-0777Buffer overflow in the LDAP component of Ipswitch IMail 7.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long "bind DN" parameter.10.0
  15. CVE-2002-1076Buffer overflow in the Web Messaging daemon for Ipswitch IMail before 7.12 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP GET request for HTTP/1.0.7.5

Product grouping is registry-driven, with AI assist and human review. How it works

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store