CVE Tools

CVE-2026-8452

Memory overflow vulnerability leading to unpredictable or erroneous behavior and Denial of Service

Exploited in the wild. In CISA KEV since 2026‑08‑26. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your Citrix NetScaler ADC or netscaler application delivery controller / netscaler gateway is currently configured as a Gateway (SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or an AAA virtual server.
  2. If it matches, plan an upgrade immediately to one of the fixed versions: ADC fixed in 72.61, 63.18, or 37.272; Gateway fixed in 72.61 or 63.18; corresponding ADC/Gateway lines as listed by Citrix.
  3. Follow Citrix guidance in CTX696604 for the exact upgrade steps, prerequisites, and any maintenance-window considerations for your model/environment.
  4. After upgrading, monitor for crashes/restarts and gateway/AAA service errors to confirm stability.

What it is

From the CVE record

Memory overflow vulnerability NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway leading to unpredictable or erroneous behavior and Denial of Service if the appliance is configured as a Gateway (SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or AAA virtual server

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-8452 is a memory bug in Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway that can let attackers crash or make it behave wrongly, but it mainly matters if your NetScaler is set up as a Gateway (SSL VPN/ICA/CVPN/RDP Proxy) or an AAA virtual server.

Memory overflow in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway that can cause Denial of Service and unpredictable behavior when the appliance is configured as a Gateway (e.g., SSL VPN/ICA Proxy/CVPN/RDP Proxy) or an AAA virtual server; it is reachable over the network without authentication.

If you're affected

  • Service outage (Denial of Service)
  • Unreliable remote access logins
  • Gateway instability
  • Loss of customer availability

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS62nd
CISA KEV
CISA KEV

Listed as exploited in the wild since 2026-08-26.

US federal agencies must remediate by 2026-08-29.

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

1.0% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 62nd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

12 events over 63 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Analysis publishedCISA's Newest KEV Batch Has an 11-Year-Old Bug in It — But Not All Six Are the Same Story
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. Added to CISA KEVpatch available, record updated
  4. OpenVAS check added
  5. Patch availablerecord updated
  6. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next exploited one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Citrix, not every advisory. This one: actively exploited.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store