CVE Tools

CVE-2026-81952

Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 55th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether you run any affected Microsoft products (Microsoft 365 Apps, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Office 365 for Mac, Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2021, Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2024, Microsoft 365, Office 2016, Office 2019, Office 2021, Office 2024).
  2. Check your installed Word build/version and compare it to the fixed versions listed below for your product.
  3. Update Microsoft Office/Word to the fixed version for your product:
    • Microsoft 365 Apps → 16.0.20326.20138
    • Microsoft Office → 16.0.5569.1003 OR 16.0.10417.20207 OR 16.0.14334.20906 OR 16.0.17932.20976
  4. If you can’t update immediately, limit exposure by reducing who can open email attachments from unknown senders and by routing external document traffic through your organization’s standard email/file safety tools until patching is complete.

What it is

From the CVE record

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-81952 is a Microsoft Word flaw that can allow an attacker to run code when a user opens a specially made document; small businesses should patch as soon as possible, especially if staff use Microsoft Office/Word and receive external files.

CVE-2026-81952 is a Microsoft Word remote code execution vulnerability (CWE-122) involving a memory corruption (heap-based buffer overflow) that can be triggered by opening a crafted document delivered over a network; it is not confirmed as exploited in the wild based on the provided findings.

If you're affected

  • Device compromise via malicious documents
  • Business data theft risk
  • Ransomware deployment risk
  • Service disruption from takeover

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS55th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.8% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 55th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

13 events over 9 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. OpenVAS check added
  3. Patch availablepatch available, record updated, record updated
  4. Patch availablepublished, weakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction RequiredA user must click a link, open a file, or perform some action

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Microsoft, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store