CVE Tools

CVE-2026-80274

Validating resolver can abort while caching a mismatched NOQNAME proof

Public exploit available. Not confirmed exploited in the wild yet. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check the installed BIND 9 version with named -v and compare it with the affected versions in the advisory.
  2. Upgrade a standard 9.20 installation to 9.20.29, a 9.21 installation to 9.21.26, or an S1 installation to 9.20.29-S1.
  3. Restart BIND 9 after the upgrade and confirm DNS lookups work from both internal systems and the internet-facing services that rely on it.
  4. If you run an older 9.11 through 9.18 release, arrange a supported-version upgrade with your DNS provider or administrator because no temporary workaround is known.

What it is

From the CVE record

If a BIND resolver sends a query for a DNSSEC-signed authoritative zone, and the authoritative server replies with a valid wildcard answer and signed NSEC3 proof, followed by an unsigned NSEC at the same owner name, it will trigger an unexpected program exit. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1 can be crashed remotely, so small businesses running their own DNS resolver should act now.

Unauthenticated network denial of service in BIND 9 validating resolvers: a crafted DNSSEC response with mismatched NOQNAME proof data can trigger an unexpected process exit.

If you're affected

  • DNS service outage
  • Website access disruption
  • Email delivery disruption
  • Internal network disruption

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS50th
Public exploit
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

0 sources with a proof of concept or module.

Exploit links, PoCs and Metasploit modules after sign-in
EPSS

0.7% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 50th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Attention now

Rising, driven by in-the-wild reports.

Lifecycle

12 events over 1 day, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availableworkaround available, record updated
  2. Patch availablepatch available, workaround available, workaround available, published, weakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Scored 7.5 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality NoneNo confidentiality impact
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for BIND 9, not every advisory. This one: public exploit.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store