CVE-2026-73286
RustF: Request headers can populate server-derived IAM condition keys, letting a caller satisfy identity-based policy conditions
No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 34th percentile. No fix published yet.
What to do
No fixed build or workaround is published yet. Limit exposure and watch for a patch.
What it is
From the CVE record
RustFS is a distributed object storage system built in Rust. Prior to 1.0.0-beta.12, RustFS get_condition_values folds attacker-controlled request headers from HeaderMap into server-derived userid, username, principaltype, groups, versionid, signatureversion, jwt:, and ldap: condition keys, allowing authenticated callers to satisfy identity-based policy conditions. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.0-beta.12.
In plain language
No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.
Exploitation
Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.
- CISA KEV
Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.
- Public exploits
No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.
- EPSS
0.4% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 34th percentile of scored CVEs.
Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.
Lifecycle
6 events over 28 days, from the signal feeds we watch.
- Record updated
- Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated, record updated
Affected products
Technical detail
CVSS 3.1 vector
Open in the CVSS calculatorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Scored 8.1 by NVD.
How it is reached
- Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
- Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
- Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
- User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation
Scope
- Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself
Impact if exploited
- Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
- Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
- Availability NoneNo availability impact
Weaknesses
ATT&CK techniques
Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.
Sources
References in the record
- github.com/rustfs/rustfs/blob/380ed40b471887014fe21d069b61df9eacca074b/.agents/skills/security-advisory-lessons/references/advisory-patterns.md?plain=1
- github.com/rustfs/rustfs/commit/92f83bfe155d8a3b9cdd903086e5b28d52339efb
- github.com/rustfs/rustfs/releases/tag/1.0.0-beta.12
And 1 more reference. See all after sign-in
Watch the software you run.
My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.
We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Rustfs, not every advisory.
A free account adds
- The full version matrix and every affected product
- Exploit links, proofs of concept and Metasploit modules
- Email alerts for the products you watch
- The same data over REST API, MCP and CLI