CVE Tools

CVE-2026-73013

Windows Imaging Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 55th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Identify your exact Windows version and build number (Settings → System → About, or run winver) and compare it to the fixed builds listed below for your edition.
  2. If you are on Windows 10, upgrade until you reach one of: 10.0.14393.9512, 10.0.17763.9245, 10.0.19044.7725, or 10.0.19045.7725.
  3. If you are on Windows 11, upgrade until you reach one of: 10.0.22631.7582, 10.0.26100.9445, 10.0.26200.9445, or 10.0.28000.2954.
  4. If you are on Windows Server, upgrade until you reach the listed fixed builds for your release: 6.2.9200.26349 (Server 2012), 6.3.9600.23397 (Server 2012 R2), 10.0.14393.9512 (Server 2016), 10.0.17763.9245 (Server 2019), or apply to get to the newest available security update for Server 2022/2025 via Microsoft Update.
  5. After updating, verify the build number again to ensure it matches a fixed version from the list, then re-check any imaging-related apps/workflows that process images from users or the network.

What it is

From the CVE record

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Imaging Component allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-73013 is a Windows security flaw that can let an attacker run code from over the network via the Windows Imaging Component; if your business runs affected Windows versions, you should act now by installing the fixed updates.

CVE-2026-73013 is a heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Imaging Component that can be triggered remotely (no login required, but with some form of victim interaction) to achieve remote code execution on affected Windows 10/11 and Windows Server releases.

If you're affected

  • Full device takeover
  • Malware installation
  • Service disruption
  • Data theft risk

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS55th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.8% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 55th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

10 events over 16 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. OpenVAS check added
  4. Record updated
  5. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction RequiredA user must click a link, open a file, or perform some action

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Windows 10 Version 1607, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store