CVE Tools

CVE-2026-72957

Windows Deployment Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 24th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether any of your machines are running Windows Deployment Services and record their OS version and build number.
  2. Compare each affected system’s current build to the vendor’s fixed builds: Windows 10 fixed in 10.0.14393.9512 or 10.0.17763.9245; Windows Server 2012 fixed in 6.2.9200.26349; Windows Server 2012 R2 fixed in 6.3.9600.23397; Windows Server 2016 fixed in 10.0.14393.9512; Windows Server 2019 fixed in 10.0.17763.9245; Windows Server 2022 fixed in 10.0.20348.5622; Windows Server 2025 fixed in 10.0.26100.33438.
  3. Install the Microsoft update for CVE-2026-72957 (per the update guide) on any affected system as soon as possible.
  4. After patching, verify the build number changed to a fixed version and confirm Windows Deployment Services functions normally.
  5. Reduce exposure: restrict network access to the Windows Deployment Services endpoints to only the systems/users that must use them.

What it is

From the CVE record

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Deployment Services allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

This Windows Deployment Services security flaw can let someone who already has access to the service run code on your server—if you use Windows Deployment Services, you should update, especially for servers reachable by trusted admin/users.

CVE-2026-72957 is a Windows Deployment Services heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) that can lead to remote code execution when an authorized attacker can reach and trigger the affected functionality; it is not listed in CISA KEV and has no public exploit code on record.

If you're affected

  • Full server takeover
  • Service downtime
  • Ransomware risk
  • Loss of sensitive data

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS24th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.3% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 24th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

11 events over 16 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. OpenVAS check added
  4. Record updatedrecord updated
  5. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 7.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Windows 10 Version 1607, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store