CVE Tools

CVE-2026-69890

Windows Virtual Trusted Platform Module Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 18th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your organization runs any of these affected products: Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022, or Windows Server 2025.
  2. Identify the exact OS version/build number and compare it against the vendor-fixed build numbers listed below.
  3. Upgrade/patch each affected device to a fixed version: Windows 10 fixed in 10.0.17763.9245, 10.0.19044.7725, or 10.0.19045.7725; Windows 11 fixed in 10.0.22631.7582, 10.0.26100.9445, 10.0.26200.9445, or 10.0.28000.2954; Windows Server 2019 fixed in 10.0.17763.9245; Windows Server 2022 fixed in 10.0.20348.5622; Windows Server 2025 fixed in 10.0.26100.33438.
  4. If immediate patching isn’t possible, restrict who can sign in with local administrative privileges and reduce access from untrusted or temporary accounts while you patch.

What it is

From the CVE record

Use after free in Windows Virtual Trusted Platform Module allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

This is a Windows local privilege-escalation flaw that affects Windows 10/11 and Windows Server editions; small businesses should patch quickly if you have administrative users or untrusted staff/accounts, because it’s the kind of bug that can turn limited access into full control.

CVE-2026-69890 is a Windows Virtual Trusted Platform Module elevation of privilege issue (CWE-416) caused by a use-after-free condition that can let an authorized attacker gain higher privileges locally on affected Windows versions; the CISA KEV list does not show this as a known actively exploited issue.

If you're affected

  • Full control of the Windows device
  • Malicious admin-level actions
  • Wider compromise of IT systems
  • Service disruption from takeover

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS18th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.3% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 18th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

9 events over 8 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. OpenVAS check added
  3. Record updated
  4. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 7.5 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity HighRequires specific conditions like a race condition or non-default configuration
  • Privileges Required HighRequires admin or elevated privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Windows 10 Version 1809, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store