CVE Tools

CVE-2026-69525

Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 60th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether you run Windows Remote Desktop Services (RDP) and identify your exact Windows version and build number (e.g., “Windows 10” or “Windows Server 2019” plus the build).
  2. Compare your build to the fixed versions below; if you are on an affected build, plan an immediate update to a fixed build.
  3. Apply the available Windows updates that move you to at least the fixed build for your exact product/branch:
    • Windows 10: update to 10.0.14393.9512, or 10.0.17763.9245, or 10.0.19044.7725, or 10.0.19045.7725
    • Windows 11: update to 10.0.22631.7582, or 10.0.26100.9445, or 10.0.26200.9445, or 10.0.28000.2954
    • Windows Server 2012: update to 6.2.9200.26349
    • Windows Server 2012 R2: update to 6.3.9600.23397
    • Windows Server 2016: update to 10.0.14393.9512
  4. After updating, confirm the build number changed and that Remote Desktop Services continues to run as expected; then re-test any remote-access workflows you rely on.

What it is

From the CVE record

Use after free in Windows Remote Desktop Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

This Windows Remote Desktop Services bug can let an attacker run code over the network, even without you clicking anything—so most small businesses using remote desktop should treat it as urgent and patch now.

CVE-2026-69525 is a remote-code-execution issue in Windows Remote Desktop Services caused by a use-after-free weakness, allowing unauthenticated network attackers to trigger the fault and execute code.

If you're affected

  • Full server takeover
  • Stop working / service disruption
  • Theft of sensitive data
  • Ransomware risk

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS60th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

1.0% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 60th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

11 events over 16 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. OpenVAS check added
  4. Record updatedrecord updated
  5. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Windows 10 Version 1607, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store