CVE Tools

CVE-2026-66147

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 77th percentile. No fix published yet.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

No fixed build or workaround is published yet. Limit exposure and watch for a patch.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your SonicWall GMS Dispatcher Service is running and confirm its version is GMS 9.5.1 or earlier.
  2. If it is running, determine whether the Dispatcher Service is reachable from the internet (public network access or port exposure).
  3. Immediately restrict network access to the Dispatcher Service so only trusted internal networks/admin systems can reach it.
  4. Create a patch/upgrade plan with your vendor or IT team; no fixed version is identified in the available information, so prioritize mitigation and urgent upgrade testing.

What it is

From the CVE record

An unauthenticated command injection vulnerability was identified in the GMS Dispatcher Service in GMS 9.5.1 and earlier versions which allows remote attacker to perform remote code execution through specially crafted requests.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

If you run SonicWall GMS Dispatcher Service (GMS 9.5.1 or older), a stranger on the internet may be able to send a crafted request to make your server run commands—so this is a serious risk that should be addressed.

Unauthenticated command injection in the GMS Dispatcher Service (GMS 9.5.1 and earlier) allows remote code execution by sending specially crafted network requests without any account or user interaction.

If you're affected

  • Server takeover via code execution
  • Service disruption
  • Customer/business data risk
  • Ransomware/extortion risk

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS77th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

1.8% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 77th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

8 events over 17 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Record updated
  2. OpenVAS check added
  3. Record updatedrecord updated
  4. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.4 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality LowSome restricted information is disclosed, but limited in scope
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for GMS, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store