CVE Tools

CVE-2026-65924

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Terraform Remote repository

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 33rd percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your JFrog Artifactory instance has the Terraform remote repository support enabled.
  2. Identify whether anonymous access is enabled for that Terraform remote repository (if yes, the risk is higher).
  3. Verify your current Artifactory version.
  4. Upgrade Artifactory to a fixed version: 7.111.18, 7.117.25, 7.125.18, 7.133.27, 7.146.34, or 7.161.15.
  5. After upgrading, review outbound network logs to confirm Artifactory is no longer contacting unexpected external endpoints associated with Terraform remote repository activity.

What it is

From the CVE record

JFrog Artifactory support for Terraform remote repositories was found to be susceptible to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An authenticated user - or, if anonymous access is enabled on the repository, an unauthenticated user - could cause Artifactory to issue outbound HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations and receive the response content.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-65924 is a server-side weakness in JFrog Artifactory that can let attackers make Artifactory contact outside websites they choose; if you use Artifactory with Terraform remote repositories enabled, you should act urgently.

CVE-2026-65924 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in JFrog Artifactory’s Terraform remote repository feature, allowing attackers to trigger the server to send arbitrary outbound HTTP requests to attacker-chosen endpoints (with authentication depending on whether anonymous access is enabled).

If you're affected

  • External system access from servers
  • Data theft from internal/external
  • Risk of benchmark or customer data exposure
  • Operational disruption from forced calls

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS33rd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.4% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 33rd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

7 events over 3 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. OpenVAS check addedpatch available, record updated
  2. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Scored 6.5 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability NoneNo availability impact

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Artifactory, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store