CVE Tools

CVE-2026-63532

Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 38th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check every device that uses Microsoft Office (including Microsoft 365 Apps, Office 2016/2019/2021/2024, Office LTSC, and the Mac variants) for its current installed version/build.
  2. If you are on Microsoft Office (Windows), update Microsoft Office to 16.0.5565.1001 (or to the latest build from https://aka.ms/OfficeSecurityReleases).
  3. If you are on Microsoft 365 Apps (Windows), update Microsoft 365 Apps to the latest security build listed at https://aka.ms/OfficeSecurityReleases.
  4. If you are on Microsoft Office for Mac / Office LTSC for Mac (2021 or 2024), update to 16.112.26081010.
  5. After updating, confirm Office apps report the updated fixed version and ensure users apply updates promptly so older builds don’t linger.

What it is

From the CVE record

Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-63532 is a Microsoft Office problem where a specially crafted Office file can let an attacker run code when the file is opened; any small business using affected Office versions should update now.

CVE-2026-63532 is a Microsoft Office integer overflow/wraparound issue (CWE-122/CWE-190) that can lead to unauthorized code execution when a user opens a maliciously crafted document; affected Microsoft Office desktop releases should be upgraded to the vendor-fixed builds.

If you're affected

  • Device takeover via Office
  • Malware installation risk
  • Data theft risk
  • Business disruption

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS38th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.5% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 38th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

9 events over 2 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. OpenVAS check addedpatch available, record updated
  2. Record updatedrecord updated
  3. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 7.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction RequiredA user must click a link, open a file, or perform some action

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Microsoft, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store