CVE Tools

CVE-2026-62897

.NET Framework Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 28th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your machines have any of the affected components installed: .NET/.NET 10/.NET 8/.NET 9/.NET Framework 3.5 (and 4.x combinations) and Visual Studio 2022 or Visual Studio 2026.
  2. Verify the exact installed versions on each affected machine against the fixed versions below.
  3. Update Visual Studio 2022 to 17.14.38 and Visual Studio 2026 to 18.8.3.
  4. Update .NET to 8.0.30, .NET 8.0 to 8.0.30, .NET 9.0 to 9.0.19, and .NET 10.0 to 10.0.11.
  5. Update Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 to 2.0.50727.9183 and 3.0.30729.9169.
  6. Update Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.7.2 to 2.0.50727.9070, 3.0.30729.9068, and 4.7.4144.0 (all applicable components).
  7. Update Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 AND 4.8 to 2.0.50727.9070, 3.0.30729.9068, and 4.8.4805.0 (all applicable components).
  8. Update Microsoft .NET Framework 4.8.1 to 4.8.9344.0.
  9. After patching, repeat the version check to confirm every machine is on a fixed version.

What it is

From the CVE record

Integer overflow or wraparound in .NET Framework allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-62897 is a .NET Framework bug that can let someone run code on your computer if they trick a user into opening a malicious file; if you have vulnerable .NET/.NET Framework or Visual Studio installed, you should update now.

CVE-2026-62897 is a .NET Framework integer overflow (CWE-190) that can be triggered by opening a specially crafted file, leading to local remote code execution with high privileges; this affects installations of .NET Framework, .NET, and Visual Studio listed in the fixed-version set.

If you're affected

  • Full computer takeover risk
  • Malware installation with privileges
  • Data theft or encryption
  • Operational disruption

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS28th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.4% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 28th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

9 events over 4 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. OpenVAS check added
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. Record updatedrecord updated
  4. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 7.0 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity HighRequires specific conditions like a race condition or non-default configuration
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction RequiredA user must click a link, open a file, or perform some action

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for .NET 10.0, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store