CVE Tools

CVE-2026-62893

Windows Deployment Services TFTP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 60th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your business uses Windows Deployment Services (WDS) and whether its TFTP service is reachable from other networks (especially the internet or untrusted networks).
  2. Identify your exact Windows version/build number for each affected machine (Windows 10, Windows Server 2012/2012 R2/2016/2019/2022/2025).
  3. Apply the vendor fixes for your OS branch: Windows 10 (10.0.14393.9418 and/or 10.0.17763.9115 and/or 10.0.17763.9121), Windows Server 2012 (6.2.9200.26280), Windows Server 2012 R2 (6.3.9600.23338), Windows Server 2016 (10.0.14393.9418), Windows Server 2019 (10.0.17763.9115 and/or 10.0.17763.9121), Windows Server 2022 (10.0.20348.5440 and/or 10.0.20348.5499), Windows Server 2025 (10.0.26100.33222 and/or 10.0.26100.33296).
  4. If patching takes time, restrict network access so the WDS TFTP server is not reachable from untrusted networks until updated.

What it is

From the CVE record

Use after free in Windows Deployment Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

This is a Windows networking bug in the Windows Deployment Services TFTP server that can let a remote attacker run malicious code without you clicking anything; if you run Windows Deployment Services, you should treat it as urgent to patch.

CVE-2026-62893 is a remote code execution vulnerability caused by a use-after-free bug in the Windows Deployment Services (WDS) TFTP server; attackers can trigger it over the network without authentication or user interaction, leading to full compromise of the affected Windows machine.

If you're affected

  • Full server takeover
  • Malware installation
  • Ransomware risk
  • Service disruption

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS60th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

1.0% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 60th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

13 events over 22 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. Patch availablerecord updated
  4. OpenVAS check added
  5. Record updated
  6. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Microsoft, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store