CVE Tools

CVE-2026-62889

Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 51st percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your Windows machines (Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012–2025) have installed the Microsoft SSTP fix for CVE-2026-62889.
  2. Compare your OS build to the fixed versions listed below and plan to upgrade Windows to the matching fixed build:
    • Windows 10: 10.0.14393.9418, 10.0.17763.9121, 10.0.19044.7663, or 10.0.19045.7663
    • Windows 11: 10.0.22631.7517, 10.0.26100.9168, 10.0.26200.9168, or 10.0.28000.2704
    • Windows Server 2012: 6.2.9200.26280
    • Windows Server 2012 R2: 6.3.9600.23338
    • Windows Server 2016: 10.0.14393.9418
    • Windows Server 2019: 10.0.17763.9121
  3. Apply the Microsoft update from the official update guide for CVE-2026-62889 (restart afterward if your update process requires it).
  4. If you can’t patch immediately, restrict network access to SSTP-facing systems (so external attackers can’t reach the SSTP service) until updates are applied.

What it is

From the CVE record

Double free in Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-62889 is a Windows security flaw in SSTP that lets an attacker run malicious code remotely, without needing a login; most small businesses should treat this as urgent because it’s a serious remote takeover risk on affected Windows systems.

CVE-2026-62889 is a double-free weakness (CWE-415) in Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) that enables remote code execution over the network without authentication or user interaction.

If you're affected

  • Full device takeover
  • Malware deployment
  • Ransomware risk
  • Business service disruption

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS51st
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.7% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 51st percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

12 events over 5 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. OpenVAS check addedpatch available, record updated
  3. Record updatedrecord updated
  4. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.1 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity HighRequires specific conditions like a race condition or non-default configuration
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Windows 10 Version 1607, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store