CVE Tools

CVE-2026-62814

Windows DHCP Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 43rd percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your business uses Windows DHCP Server on windows 10, windows server 2012, windows server 2016, windows server 2019, windows server 2022, windows server 2025, or windows server 2012 r2 (and confirm the DHCP Server role/service is running on those machines).
  2. If affected, plan an update to the fixed versions for your Windows release:
    • windows 10: 10.0.14393.9418 or 10.0.17763.9115 (and/or 10.0.17763.9121)
    • windows server 2012: 6.2.9200.26280
    • windows server 2012 r2: 6.3.9600.23338
    • windows server 2016: 10.0.14393.9418
    • windows server 2019: 10.0.17763.9115 or 10.0.17763.9121
    • windows server 2022: 10.0.20348.5440 or 10.0.20348.5499
    • windows server 2025: 10.0.26100.33222 or 10.0.26100.33296
  3. Validate after patching that the server’s Windows build/version matches one of the fixed versions above and restart/confirm DHCP Server service health per your normal maintenance procedure.

What it is

From the CVE record

Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over an adjacent network.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

If you run Windows DHCP Server on your local network, someone nearby on the same network could trigger a flaw to view private system information from that server, without logging in. Fix it because this is a real patch, and patching is the main way to reduce risk.

Windows DHCP Server has an information disclosure flaw caused by an integer handling weakness (underflow/wraparound) that allows an unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent local network segment to elicit an error path and exfiltrate sensitive system details without user interaction.

If you're affected

  • Private network details exposed
  • Targeted follow-on attacks easier
  • Privacy and configuration leakage
  • Operational disruption risk

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS43rd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.5% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 43rd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

12 events over 22 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. Patch availablerecord updated
  4. OpenVAS check added
  5. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Scored 6.5 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector AdjacentRequires access to the local network (e.g. same Wi-Fi, Bluetooth)
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability NoneNo availability impact

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Microsoft, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store