CVE Tools

CVE-2026-53413

Zoom Clients - Buffer Over-write

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 40th percentile. No fix published yet.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

No fixed build or workaround is published yet. Limit exposure and watch for a patch.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check which “Zoom Clients” version(s) your organization is running on all employee devices (including desktops and any devices used to join meetings).
  2. Contact your Zoom admin/vendor support or consult Zoom’s security advisories for CVE-2026-53413 to see whether an update is available for your specific client version.
  3. Update Zoom Clients to the latest available version from Zoom as soon as a fix is confirmed for CVE-2026-53413.
  4. Review meeting practices: limit who can invite external attendees, and consider using waiting rooms or stricter controls for meetings with parties you don’t trust.
  5. If you cannot update right away, reduce exposure by avoiding joining meetings from untrusted sources/unknown invitees until Zoom provides a fixed version.

What it is

From the CVE record

Missing bounds check in the annotator function of Zoom Clients allows buffer over-write, which may allow a meeting participant to achieve remote code execution of another participant via network access.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-53413 is a Zoom Clients problem where a meeting participant can send specially crafted data that can cause Zoom to run malicious code on another person’s computer; typical small businesses should worry, especially if you regularly join meetings with people you don’t fully control.

CVE-2026-53413 is a network-triggered buffer overwrite in Zoom Clients where a meeting participant can send oversized/specially crafted data without proper bounds checking, leading to arbitrary code execution on a victim’s device; it requires user interaction (the victim must interact/join the meeting flow).

If you're affected

  • Malware execution on employee devices
  • Meeting account/session compromise risk
  • Service disruption from compromised clients
  • Potential data theft from endpoints

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS40th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.5% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 40th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

7 events over 17 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Record updated
  2. OpenVAS check added
  3. Record updated
  4. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.3 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity HighRequires specific conditions like a race condition or non-default configuration
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction RequiredA user must click a link, open a file, or perform some action

Scope

  • Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Zoom Clients, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store