CVE Tools

CVE-2026-53266

netfilter: bridge: make ebt_snat ARP rewrite writable

Exploited in the wild. In CISA KEV since 2026‑09‑18. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check each Linux server's running kernel version and whether it uses bridge ebtables SNAT rules that rewrite ARP addresses.
  2. Install your Linux distributor's security kernel update containing the fix; upstream fixes are available in 5.5, 5.9, and 5.10.
  3. If an update cannot be installed immediately, disable affected ebtables SNAT ARP-rewrite rules and restrict untrusted local user access.
  4. Restart into the updated kernel and confirm the new version is running.

What it is

From the CVE record

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: bridge: make ebt_snat ARP rewrite writable The ebtables SNAT target keeps the Ethernet source address rewrite behind skb_ensure_writable(skb, 0). This is intentional: at the bridge ebtables hooks the Ethernet header is addressed through skb_mac_header()/eth_hdr(), while skb->data points at the Ethernet payload. Asking skb_ensure_writable() for ETH_HLEN bytes would check the payload, not the Ethernet header, and would reintroduce the small packet regression fixed by commit 63137bc5882a. However, the optional ARP sender hardware address rewrite is different. It writes through skb_store_bits() at an offset relative to skb->data: skb_store_bits(skb, sizeof(struct arphdr), info->mac, ETH_ALEN) skb_header_pointer() only safely reads the ARP header; it does not make the later sender hardware address range writable. If that range is still held in a nonlinear skb fragment backed by a splice-imported file page, skb_store_bits() maps the frag page and copies the new MAC address directly into it. Ensure the ARP SHA range is writable before reading the ARP header and before calling skb_store_bits().

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2026-53266 is a serious Linux kernel flaw in systems missing the 5.5 or vendor-backported fix, and small businesses with affected servers should act urgently.

A local low-privileged attacker can exploit an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in Linux kernel bridge ebtables SNAT ARP rewriting, potentially escalating to full system compromise.

If you're affected

  • Full server takeover
  • Sensitive data exposure
  • Service outages
  • Ransomware risk

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS49th
CISA KEV
CISA KEV

Listed as exploited in the wild since 2026-09-18.

US federal agencies must remediate by 2026-09-21.

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.6% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 49th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Attention now

Sustained, driven by in-the-wild reports.

Lifecycle

14 events over 86 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Added to CISA KEVpatch available, patch available, record updated, record updated
  3. OpenVAS check added
  4. Patch availablerecord updated
  5. Record updated
  6. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped

Affected products

And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next exploited one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Linux, not every advisory. This one: actively exploited.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store