CVE Tools

CVE-2026-48316

ColdFusion | Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 65th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check which coldfusion version you are running, and confirm whether it is 2025.9 or 2023.20 or earlier.
  2. Verify whether your ColdFusion service is reachable from untrusted networks (for example, the public internet) without an authentication requirement.
  3. If it is reachable, restrict access immediately (allow-list only the required IPs, put it behind a VPN, or block external access at your firewall/reverse proxy).
  4. Review your web server/WAF/reverse proxy rules for any controls that might block malformed or suspicious requests to ColdFusion endpoints.
  5. Contact your ColdFusion/Adobe support or vendor and ask for an emergency mitigation or available update for CVE-2026-48316; there is currently no specific fixed version listed in the available information.

What it is

From the CVE record

ColdFusion versions 2025.9, 2023.20 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

If you run affected versions of Adobe ColdFusion, an attacker may be able to run code on your server over the network without any login or user action—this is serious and you should act now, especially if your ColdFusion site is reachable from the internet.

CVE-2026-48316 is an Improper Input Validation flaw in coldfusion that can enable unauthenticated network-based arbitrary code execution as the current user (no user interaction required) against coldfusion versions 2025.9, 2023.20, and earlier; no patch details are available yet.

If you're affected

  • Full server compromise
  • Stolen customer/business data
  • Website or system downtime
  • Ransomware deployment risk

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS65th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

1.1% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 65th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

12 events over 53 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. OpenVAS check added
  4. Patch availablerecord updated
  5. Record updated
  6. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Scored 10.0 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability NoneNo availability impact

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Coldfusion, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store