CVE Tools

CVE-2026-26035

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 53rd percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check your FortiWeb version and whether the FortiWeb management interface (GUI and/or CLI) is reachable from the internet or other external networks.
  2. If you are on FortiWeb 8.0.0–8.0.2, upgrade to FortiWeb 8.0.3 or above.
  3. If you are on FortiWeb 7.6.0–7.6.6, upgrade to FortiWeb 7.6.7 or above.
  4. If you are on FortiWeb 7.4.0–7.4.11, upgrade to FortiWeb 7.4.12 or above.
  5. If you are on FortiWeb 7.2.0–7.2.12 or 7.0.0–7.0.12, upgrade to the upcoming FortiWeb 7.2.13 or 7.0.13 or above as directed by Fortinet.
  6. If you cannot upgrade immediately, restrict network access so the management interface is not reachable from untrusted networks (for example, block external access and allow only from your admin network).

What it is

From the CVE record

An Improper Authentication vulnerability [CWE-287] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.12 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to login into the Fortiweb GUI/CLI with a random username and password

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

Fortinet FortiWeb has a login-check flaw that lets an attacker access the admin interface with any username and password—so a typical small business should treat this as urgent if FortiWeb’s management console is reachable from the network.

Fortinet FortiWeb is vulnerable to an Improper Authentication issue (CWE-287) that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass login checks and gain full administrative control over the device by attempting management-console access with arbitrary credentials.

If you're affected

  • Full administrative takeover
  • Service disruption risk
  • Compromise of web traffic
  • Potential ransomware leverage

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS53rd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.8% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 53rd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

12 events over 27 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. OpenVAS check added
  4. Patch availablerecord updated
  5. Patch availablepublished, weakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for FortiWeb, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store