CVE Tools

CVE-2025-59719

An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.9 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to byp...

Exploitation likely. EPSS gives it a 29% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD, BDU, CSAF

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether you are running Fortinet FortiWeb version 8.0.0 or 7.6.0–7.6.4 or 7.4.0–7.4.9, and whether FortiCloud SSO login is enabled and configured.
  2. If you are affected, plan an immediate upgrade to a fixed FortiProxy / FortiSwitchManager / FortiWeb version as provided by Fortinet PSIRT (FG-IR-25-647).
  3. Contact your Fortinet support channel (or your vendor/managed service provider) to confirm the exact FortiWeb fixed versions for your environment and complete the secure update procedure.
  4. Until upgraded, review exposure: restrict network access to SSO/SSO-related endpoints and block internet access where possible, then monitor for suspicious SSO/SSO-auth events related to FortiCloud SSO.

What it is

From the CVE record

Fortinet has published information on vulnerabilities in FortiOS. This advisory lists the related Siemens Industrial products. Siemens is preparing fix versions and recommends to consult and implement the workarounds provided in Fortinet's upstream security notifications.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2025-59719 is a Fortinet FortiWeb SSO weakness that lets an outsider forge a SAML login and impersonate a user, and it has been exploited in the wild—so if you run the affected Fortinet products, you should treat this as urgent.

CVE-2025-59719 enables unauthenticated SAML authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiWeb (via improper cryptographic signature verification), allowing attackers to forge/alter SAML responses to impersonate authenticated users.

If you're affected

  • Account takeover via SSO
  • Unauthorized access to systems
  • Service disruption
  • Wider breach risk

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS98th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

29% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 98th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

7 events over 198 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. OpenVAS check added
  2. EPSS band changelow → moderate
  3. Patch availablerecord updated
  4. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for FortiOS, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store