CVE Tools

CVE-2025-49113

Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.10 and 1.6.x before 1.6.11 allows remote code execution by authenticated users because the _from parameter in a URL is not validated in program/actions/settings/upload....

Exploited in the wild. In CISA KEV since 2026‑02‑20. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD, GitHub, BDU

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check your RoundCube Webmail version and confirm whether it is earlier than 1.5.10 or (for the 1.6 line) earlier than 1.6.11.
  2. Upgrade RoundCube Webmail to 1.5.10 (if you are on the 1.5 branch) or to 1.6.11 (if you are on the 1.6 branch).
  3. If you cannot upgrade immediately, apply the vendor/workaround mitigation steps for CVE-2025-49113 and restrict who can access the webmail login.
  4. Review web server and RoundCube logs for unusual actions from authenticated webmail users around the time of any suspicious activity.

What it is

From the CVE record

Roundcube Webmail Vulnerable to Authenticated RCE via PHP Object Deserialization

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2025-49113 is a RoundCube Webmail flaw that lets a logged-in attacker run code on your email server; if you use an affected RoundCube Webmail version, this is a serious, urgent problem.

CVE-2025-49113 is an authenticated remote code execution flaw in RoundCube Webmail caused by insufficient validation of the URL “_from” parameter, enabling attackers to trigger server-side code execution; it is listed in CISA KEV and has a remediation due date.

If you're affected

  • Full server compromise
  • Email account takeover
  • Data theft risk
  • Service disruption

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS99th
CISA KEV
CISA KEV

Listed as exploited in the wild since 2026-02-20.

US federal agencies must remediate by 2026-03-13.

Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

99% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 99th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Attention now

Sustained, driven by in-the-wild reports.

Lifecycle

12 events over 404 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. EPSS band changehigh → criticalepss band change
  2. OpenVAS check added
  3. EPSS band changecritical → high
  4. Nuclei check added
  5. Patch availableworkaround available, record updated
  6. Added to CISA KEV

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.9 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next exploited one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for RoundCube Webmail, not every advisory. This one: actively exploited.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store