CVE Tools

CVE-2025-30208

Vite bypasses server.fs.deny when using `?raw??`

Public exploit available. Not confirmed exploited in the wild yet. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD, GitHub, BDU

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your business uses Vite (especially any public-facing Vite dev server or internal tool exposed to users) and whether server.fs.deny is configured to block sensitive paths.
  2. Verify you are on a Vite version older than 6.2.3 (and not one of the listed safe versions) by checking your project’s installed vite package version.
  3. Upgrade Vite to the fixed release: vite fixed in 6.2.3.
  4. After upgrading, test that requests using the ?raw?? pattern no longer return blocked files (e.g., try fetching a known-to-be-denied path through your app’s usual routes).
  5. If you cannot upgrade immediately, reduce exposure by ensuring the Vite dev server is not reachable from untrusted networks/users and limit who can access it.
npm install vite@^6.2.3

What it is

From the CVE record

Vite bypasses server.fs.deny when using ?raw??

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

Vite can be tricked into serving files from inside your server even when your settings explicitly block those files, and this requires an attacker to reach your dev server and prompt a victim to open a crafted link.

In Vite, the server’s file-blocking rule `server.fs.deny` can be bypassed via a special `?raw??`-style request, allowing network-reachable retrieval of blocked files without authentication; exploitation appears to be in the wild (sustained press attention).

If you're affected

  • Confidential source code exposure
  • Secrets and config file exposure
  • Intellectual property theft risk
  • Targeted insider-data leakage

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS99th
Public exploit
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

1 source with a proof of concept or module.

Exploit links, PoCs and Metasploit modules after sign-in
EPSS

75% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 99th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

The patch came 164 days before any public exploit.

  1. OpenVAS check added
  2. Public exploit / PoCsource: github-poc
  3. Nuclei check added
  4. Patch availablerecord updated
  5. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Scored 5.3 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity HighRequires specific conditions like a race condition or non-default configuration
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction RequiredA user must click a link, open a file, or perform some action

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability NoneNo availability impact

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Vite, not every advisory. This one: public exploit.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store