CVE Tools

CVE-2024-7437

SimpleMachines SMF Delete User index.php resource injection

Public exploit available. Not confirmed exploited in the wild yet. No fix published yet.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

No fixed build or workaround is published yet. Limit exposure and watch for a patch.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether you run Simple Machines Forum (SMF) version 2.1.4.
  2. Verify whether non-admin users can reach the vulnerable endpoint path in practice (for example, by reviewing access controls for the profile/remove alert flow).
  3. If you are on 2.1.4, contact your SMF maintainer/vendor or hosting support to get a remediation plan, since no fixed version is known in the available patch information.
  4. Until a fix is available, reduce risk by limiting who can perform low-privileged actions that might reach this endpoint, and monitor the web app for repeated requests to the profile/remove endpoint with unusual URL parameters.

What it is

From the CVE record

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in SimpleMachines SMF 2.1.4. Affected is an unknown function of the file /index.php?action=profile;u=2;area=showalerts;do=remove of the component Delete User Handler. The manipulation of the argument aid leads to improper control of resource identifiers. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

CVE-2024-7437 is a Simple Machines Forum (SMF) bug where a low-privileged user can tweak a website link and potentially disrupt account-related actions; if you run SMF 2.1.4 and allow user accounts, you should act soon, especially since a public proof-of-concept exists.

CVE-2024-7437 is a parameter manipulation issue in Simple Machines Forum (SMF) via /index.php?action=profile;u=2;area=showalerts;do=remove, where a low-privileged user can tamper with the URL query argument 'aid' to bypass expected resource controls and influence which resource identifier is processed, enabling integrity/availability impact.

If you're affected

  • Account-action disruption
  • Forum integrity issues
  • Service availability impact
  • Low-effort misuse by insiders

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS36th
Public exploit
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

1 source with a proof of concept or module.

Exploit links, PoCs and Metasploit modules after sign-in
EPSS

0.4% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 36th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

6 events over 691 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. OpenVAS check added
  2. Public exploit / PoCsource: github-poc
  3. Record updated
  4. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Scored 5.4 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality NoneNo confidentiality impact
  • Integrity LowData modification is possible but limited in scope or consequence
  • Availability LowReduced performance or intermittent disruption of service

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Simple Machines Forum, not every advisory. This one: public exploit.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store