CVE Tools

CVE-2017-3730

Bad (EC)DHE parameters cause a client crash

Public exploit available. Not confirmed exploited in the wild yet. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD, BDU

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether any systems use OpenSSL 1.1.0 versions earlier than 1.1.0d.
  2. Upgrade OpenSSL to a fixed release per your platform (Debian/SUSE/Astra: update to the vendor’s patched package versions).
  3. Verify services that perform outgoing TLS connections (web apps, APIs, reverse proxies) are restarted after the upgrade.
  4. If you cannot upgrade immediately, reduce exposure by restricting outbound TLS connections only to trusted endpoints (or block untrusted servers) until patched.

What it is

From the CVE record

In OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d, if a malicious server supplies bad parameters for a DHE or ECDHE key exchange then this can result in the client attempting to dereference a NULL pointer leading to a client crash. This could be exploited in a Denial of Service attack.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

This OpenSSL issue can let an attacker crash clients during a network connection handshake, and it matters most if you use OpenSSL 1.1.0 versions before 1.1.0d.

CVE-2017-3730 is a Denial of Service in OpenSSL 1.1.0 (before 1.1.0d) where invalid (EC)DHE key-exchange parameters sent by a malicious server cause a client crash during the TLS handshake.

If you're affected

  • Client/service downtime
  • Disrupted customer connections
  • Operational disruption

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS99th
Public exploit
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

1 source with a proof of concept or module.

Exploit links, PoCs and Metasploit modules after sign-in
EPSS

55% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 99th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Attention now

Rising.

Lifecycle

A public exploit existed 67 days before the patch.

  1. EPSS band changemoderate → highepss band change
  2. EPSS band changehigh → moderateepss band change
  3. EPSS band changemoderate → highepss band change
  4. EPSS band changehigh → moderateepss band change
  5. EPSS band changemoderate → highepss band change
  6. EPSS band changehigh → moderate

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Scored 7.5 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality NoneNo confidentiality impact
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Oracle, not every advisory. This one: public exploit.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store