CVE Tools

CVE-2017-18014

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 83rd percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check your Sophos XG Firewall SFOS version and confirm it is earlier than 17.0.3 MR3.
  2. If you are earlier than 17.0.3 MR3, schedule an upgrade to SFOS 17.0.3 MR3 or later.
  3. After upgrading, review WAF/Logging configuration and confirm that the admin log viewer is functioning normally, then monitor for any unusual admin activity around log viewing times.

What it is

From the CVE record

An NC-25986 issue was discovered in the Logging subsystem of Sophos XG Firewall with SFOS before 17.0.3 MR3. An unauthenticated user can trigger a persistent XSS vulnerability found in the WAF log page (Control Center -> Log Viewer -> in the filter option "Web Server Protection") in the webadmin interface, and execute any action available to the webadmin of the firewall (e.g., creating a new user, enabling SSH, or adding an SSH authorized key). The WAF log page will execute the "User-Agent" parameter in the HTTP POST request.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

If you run Sophos XG Firewall (SFOS) and your version is older than 17.0.3 MR3, an attacker can plant malicious code in the firewall’s WAF logs, and it may run later when an administrator views those logs in the browser—so you should upgrade.

CVE-2017-18014 is a persistent cross-site scripting (CWE-79) issue in the Logging subsystem of Sophos XG Firewall (SFOS); an unauthenticated attacker can insert script into WAF log content so that when an administrator views the log report in the webadmin interface, the injected code executes in the browser and can trigger actions available in the administrative interface.

If you're affected

  • Firewall admin actions taken
  • Unauthorized access enabled
  • Customer traffic disruption
  • Security control bypass

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS83rd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

2.3% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 83rd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

23 events over 3176 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. EPSS band changemoderate → lowepss band change
  2. EPSS band changelow → moderateepss band change
  3. EPSS band changemoderate → 0epss band change
  4. EPSS band change0 → moderateepss band change
  5. EPSS band changemoderate → 0epss band change
  6. EPSS band changelow → moderate

Affected products

And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in

Technical detail

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Scored 6.1 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction RequiredA user must click a link, open a file, or perform some action

Scope

  • Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality LowSome restricted information is disclosed, but limited in scope
  • Integrity LowData modification is possible but limited in scope or consequence
  • Availability NoneNo availability impact

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Sfos, not every advisory.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store