CVE Tools

CVE-2016-9796

Public exploit available. Not confirmed exploited in the wild yet. No fix published yet.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

No fixed build or workaround is published yet. Limit exposure and watch for a patch.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether you run OmniVista 8770 Network Management System and whether TCP port 30024 is reachable from untrusted networks.
  2. There is no confirmed fixed version available; ask your Alcatel-Lucent/Nokia support contact for the supported remediation path.
  3. Block inbound TCP port 30024 at firewalls except from specifically approved management systems.
  4. Review the server for unexpected administrator-level commands, jobs, or configuration changes.

What it is

From the CVE record

Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista 8770 2.0 through 3.0 exposes different ORBs interfaces, which can be queried using the GIOP protocol on TCP port 30024. An attacker can bypass authentication, and OmniVista invokes methods (AddJobSet, AddJob, and ExecuteNow) that can be used to run arbitrary commands on the server, with the privilege of NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on the server. NOTE: The discoverer states "The vendor position is to refer to the technical guidelines of the product security deployment to mitigate this issue, which means applying proper firewall rules to prevent unauthorised clients to connect to the OmniVista server."

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

OmniVista 8770 Network Management System versions 2.0 through 3.0 can let a network-connected attacker take full control without logging in, so restrict access to port 30024 now.

Unauthenticated network RCE via exposed GIOP/ORB interfaces on TCP port 30024 allows execution of operating-system commands with full administrative privileges.

If you're affected

  • Full server takeover
  • Network management disruption
  • Network configuration changes
  • Sensitive data exposure
  • Ransomware risk

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS96th
Public exploit
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

2 sources with a proof of concept or module.

Exploit links, PoCs and Metasploit modules after sign-in
EPSS

13% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 96th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Attention now

Rising.

Lifecycle

23 events over 3581 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. EPSS band changelow → moderateepss band change
  2. EPSS band changemoderate → lowepss band change
  3. EPSS band change0 → moderateepss band change
  4. EPSS band changemoderate → 0epss band change
  5. EPSS band change0 → moderateepss band change
  6. EPSS band changemoderate → low

Affected products

And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in

Technical detail

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Alcatel-lucent, not every advisory. This one: public exploit.

We use analytics cookies to see which pages and articles actually help people. Decline and none of them run — the site works the same. What we store